Stockfish 18 vs Berserk — Nimzo-Indian Defense | Bishop Sacrifice
- by greatsurajitgenius@gmail.com
- in Uncategorized
- on January 16, 2026
Stockfish 18 vs Berserk — A Fierce Nimzo-Indian Battle
Opening: Nimzo-Indian Defense, Hübner Variation (E41)
Time Control: 600 + 3
Engines: Stockfish 18 (4060 Elo) vs Berserk (4021 Elo)
Result: Stockfish 18 won
More games: RamaChess.com
How the Game Played Out
This game quickly turned into a sharp and aggressive fight in the Nimzo-Indian Defense. Stockfish 18 allowed imbalance early, clearly signaling that the position would be about initiative and calculation rather than quiet maneuvering.
Berserk didn’t hesitate to complicate matters and soon made a bold decision by sacrificing a bishop to fuel the attack. For a moment, the position looked dangerous, with kings exposed and the board full of tactical threats.
What followed was a perfect example of Stockfish’s defensive strength. Instead of panicking, it absorbed the pressure, neutralized the attack piece by piece, and gradually turned the tables. Once the initiative shifted, there was no way back.
As the game moved into the later stages, Stockfish’s superiority became clear. Better king safety, active pieces, and precise timing allowed it to convert the advantage with confidence. Berserk’s earlier sacrifice no longer had compensation.
The finish was decisive and clean. Stockfish closed the game with authority, showing why even brave sacrifices must be perfectly calculated against a machine of this level.